Compare

TRINTA vs TED and the free national portals

The official portals are free, authoritative and should be anyone's starting point; TRINTA exists because reading ten of them every morning is a job rather than a browser tab. TED carries only above-threshold EU contracts, so the below-threshold work published on national systems never appears there. No official portal scores a notice against what your company makes, none of them read each other, and each publishes in its own language and format. TRINTA reads those same official sources, 1010+ of them daily, and returns a ranked shortlist with the documents attached instead of a chronological list.

What the official portals do well

The honest case for the alternative, made first and made properly.

  • Free, and authoritative: they are the legal publication point, so nothing beats them for accuracy.
  • Complete for their own scope. If you sell into one country, that country's portal has everything it is obliged to publish.
  • Direct from the buyer, with no intermediary to introduce a delay or an error.
  • Most offer some form of free email alert, which covers the simplest case at zero cost.

Where they run out

The specific failures that make companies go looking for something else.

  • TED holds above-threshold contracts only, which is a minority of contracts by count. Below-threshold work sits on national and regional systems.
  • One portal per country, each with its own format, language, login and update rhythm. Coverage across a region means monitoring many of them.
  • No ranking against your products, so every notice arrives with equal weight and the triage is yours.
  • Documents live behind portal navigation, often several clicks and a registration wall deep, so the annexes go unread until late.
  • Nothing looks forward. A framework expiring in eight months is invisible until the re-tender is published, by which point the incumbent has been preparing for months.

Side by side

DimensionTED and the free national portalsTRINTA
CostFreeFrom €2,000 per month
ScopeOne portal, its own jurisdiction and thresholds1,539 platforms mapped across 153+ countries, activated per client
Below-threshold EU workNot on TED. On each national portal separatelyNational portals read alongside TED
RelevanceYou read and judge every noticeScored 0 to 100 against your catalogue before you see it
Daily effortManual, and it scales with the number of portalsOne scored digest each morning
Forward viewNone. Notices only, when publishedPrior information notices and frameworks aging toward re-tender

Stay on the official portals alone when

Real advice against the sale. If one of these describes you, this is the better buy and we would rather you made it.

  • Your entire addressable market is one national portal, and someone on the team genuinely reads it.
  • You need the legal record rather than a working shortlist. For that, always go to the official source.
  • Your bid volume is low enough that missing one is an inconvenience rather than a lost year.
  • Budget is the binding constraint. Free official alerts beat an unaffordable platform, and TRINTA is not a small purchase.

Questions

Does TRINTA replace TED?

No, and it should not. TED remains the authoritative legal publication point for above-threshold EU contracts, and any bid should be verified against the official notice. TRINTA reads TED alongside the national portals of the member states, scores what it finds against your product range, and attaches the documents, so TED is a source underneath TRINTA rather than a competitor to it.

Why do I need anything beyond the official portals?

Because relevance and reach are not what portals are built for. An official portal publishes accurately within its own jurisdiction and thresholds, in its own language, in publication order. It will not tell you that a notice in another country matches what you make, and it will not tell you a framework you could bid on expires next spring.

How many official portals would I have to watch to match TRINTA's coverage?

TRINTA's registry holds 1,539 mapped procurement platforms across 153+ countries, and puts 1010+ of them under daily scanning per client profile. No client needs all of them: each activates the sources matching where it actually sells. The realistic comparison for most companies is between eight or ten portals watched badly and the same ones watched every morning.

The other comparisons

Still deciding? The answers page covers pricing, coverage and fit in full, and the demo call runs your own catalogue against live sources before we speak.